In June 2023, we expressed our support for the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures(TCFD). We recognize the various impacts of climate change as a high-priority issue for our Group, which contributes to a future of greater happiness by delivering nature’s blessings ー the source of our business ー in various forms to society at large. Based on this recognition, since FY2022, we have been conducting scenario analyses and assessing risks and opportunities in line with TCFD recommendations, and disclosing the results. We integrate these insights into our operational risk management and corporate strategies, and we will proactively disclose our progress going forward. We aim to achieve further growth while contributing to the decarbonization of society as a whole.
Our Group recognizes that addressing sustainability challenges such as climate change and human rights is a key management issue that reduces risk and drives corporate growth. We have established the sustainability management system shown on the right. Matters examined and deliberated by the Sustainability Committee are submitted as recommendations to the Management Meeting and then further reviewed and deliberated by the Management Meeting and the Board of Directors.
Roles and Functions of Each Organization Related to Sustainability
Identification of Material Risks
To identify climate-related risks and opportunities, we compiled a comprehensive list covering the Group’s core businesses: the domestic and overseas sugar business and the Life Energy business. Next, we assessed the financial impact of all risks and opportunities referencing publicly available information [*3] and other sources. Taking into consideration the impact on the Group’s business, we then extracted and organized the following items.
| Period | Category | Item | Type | Potential Risks and Opportunities | Financial Impact Physical: 4°C Transition: 1.5°C |
Countermeasures and Opportunities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short-term Medium-term |
Acute | Increase in scale and frequency of natural disasters | Risk | Increased damage costs to Group factories and facilities due to intensifying severe weather disasters | High | ◦Strengthen regular maintenance of facilities ◦Strengthen backup systems across six domestic sugar refineries ◦Regular BCP drills and reviews ◦Collaboration with raw material suppliers and multiple sourcing |
| Risk | Occurrence of losses to the Group due to operational suspension or other disruptions at supply chain partners | Medium | ◦Collaboration with raw material suppliers and multiple sourcing ◦Securing alternative raw and auxiliary materials with high dependency, and verifying and securing alternative production methods |
|||
| Chronic | Sea level rise | Risk | Decline in supply capacity for raw materials and products, driven by a reduction in production sites due to loss of arable land and a decrease in logistics hubs | Low | ◦Formulation of BCP plans ◦Gathering information to secure alternative arable land, and securing alternative logistics routes |
|
| Long-term shifts in climate patterns, such as average temperatures and precipitation patterns | Risk/Opportunity | Fluctuations in the supply of raw materials (sugar beets and sugarcane) due to changes in average temperatures and other climate factors | High | ◦Introduction of crop varieties with high resilience to climate and temperature changes (sugar beets and sugarcane) ◦Establishment of farming practices adaptable to climate changes (sugarcane) ◦Introduction of crop varieties with high resistance to diseases and pests (sugar beets) ◦Review of products and pricing structures in anticipation of raw material price fluctuations (international market rates) driven by changes in supply volume |
||
| Risk/Opportunity | Fluctuations in sales driven by changes in sugar consumption behavior due to rising temperatures | Low | ◦Balanced sales policies for end products, such as beverages and foods consumed across various temperature ranges (leveling of sales portfolios) ◦Joint development of products that suppress the increased risks of diseases associated with rising temperatures (e.g., beverages for heatstroke prevention) |
|||
| Risk | Increased costs driven by the strengthening of heat countermeasures, primarily in production divisions, due to rising average temperatures | Low | ◦Continued implementation and horizontal expansion of heat countermeasures ◦Promotion of labor-saving production processes to reduce the risk of human injuries |
| Period | Category | Item | Type | Potential Risks and Opportunities | Financial Impact Physical:4°C Transition:1.5°C |
Countermeasures and Opportunities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-term | Policies and legal systems | Increase in carbon pricing | Risk | Increased costs due to the introduction of carbon taxes and emissions trading systems, etc. | High | ◦Adoption of energy creation, energy conservation and decarbonization energy ◦Reduction of CO2 emissions in collaboration with suppliers ◦Review of products and pricing structures ◦Fundamental review of manufacturing processes to reduce CO2 emissions (efforts toward process innovation) ◦Fundamental review of raw material procurement methods to reduce CO2 emissions |
| Technological advancements | Development of new low-carbon and decarbonized production technologies | Risk/Opportunity | Increased R&D expenses for new technology development Reduced manufacturing costs through energy cost reductions |
Medium | ◦Cost reduction through detailed review of fuel switching implementation costs ◦Promotion of joint research with industry peers and companies in other industries in non-competitive areas ◦Boiler fuel switching in manufacturing plants (promoting defossilization) |
|
| Risk | Increased raw material procurement costs due to the use of raw materials (sugarcane) for bioethanol as a renewable fuel | Low | ◦Review of products and pricing structures in anticipation of rising raw material prices (international market prices) due to reduced supply | |||
| Technological innovation related to low-carbon and decarbonization | Opportunity | Suppressing increased business costs, including through joint delivery with business partners within the Group supply chain, modal shifts, and optimized order placements | Medium | ◦Promotion of joint delivery and modal shift ◦Consideration of joint delivery and other measures with industry peers and companies in other industries in non-competitive areas |
||
| Market changes | Social demand for environmentally friendly products | Risk | Costs incurred by shifting consumer behavior toward environmentally friendly products | Low | ◦Appropriate transition to environmentally friendly products ◦Promotion of high added value through the development of new environmentally friendly products |
|
| Reputation | Reputational risk arising from a passive corporate stance toward decarbonization | Risk | Decline in corporate image and decrease in corporate value due to a passive stance toward decarbonization | Medium | ◦Timely disclosure of information related to decarbonization initiatives and expansion of communication channels ◦Strengthening sustainability management and enhancing communication with all stakeholders, including investors |
Furthermore, we identified risks with particularly significant financial impacts as material risks, and evaluated them based on climate change scenarios as follows (a 4℃ scenario [*4] for physical risks and a 1.5℃ scenario [*5] for transition risks).
We then confirmed our framework for minimizing risks and exploring opportunities.
Countermeasures for Identified Material Risks
*1 Risks of direct damage to assets and business operations resulting from natural disasters and other events induced by climate change.
*2 Risks associated with changes in policies, legal frameworks, technological innovation, and market preference arising from the transition to a low-carbon society.
*3 Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, “Introduction to Information Disclosure on Climate-Related Risks and Opportunities in the Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries” (June 2021).
*4 For the projected rate of increase in estimated damage in coastal and river basin areas where the applicable facilities are located, refer to “Aqueduct Floods” by the World Resources Institute (WRI) [ https://www.wri.org/applications/aqueduct/floods/ ].
*5 For projected future carbon prices, refer to the Net Zero Emissions scenario in “World Energy Outlook 2025” by the International Energy Agency (IEA).
*6 Hokkaido Research Organization, Agricultural Research Department, Central Agricultural Experiment Station, “Report on Research Program for Evaluating the Impact of Global Warming on the Changes in Agricultural Productivity in Hokkaido for the decades 2030s” (Misc. Pub. of Hokkaido Agri. Exp. Stn. No. 39, October 2011)
*7 The Future of Sugarcane Farming on Ishigaki Island ー Balancing Sustainable Agriculture and Environmental Conservation
[ https://sustainability.msdm-hd.com/topics/571/ ]
| The Company | 67,422 t-CO2 |
|---|---|
| The Group | 229,709 t-CO2 (third-party assurance has only been obtained for the Company’s figures) |
Our Group is committed to realizing a sustainable society by achieving these targets.
*1 For these KPIs, the scope covers Mitsui DM Sugar Co., Ltd., Kanmon Sugar Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Hokkaido Sugar Co., Ltd.
*2 Water usage is defined as water resources used in conjunction with production activities (based on wastewater volume).
*3 Zero waste means a waste recycling ratio of 98% or higher.